Workplace: Can We Sweep The World Without Sweeping?

There is an allusion in ancient times that it is famous for sweeping the world without sweeping.

The story is like this. A man named Chen Fan lived alone when he was fifteen years old, and his room was in a mess. His father's friend Xue Qinlai visited him and said to him, "why don't you care for the guests?" why do you not clean the house to receive guests? He said, "when a man is in the world, he will sweep away the world and have a safe room." and Xue Qin feels that this child is ambitious and will become a great master.

As a result, the child really ranked three, which is basically equal to the Prime Minister of the country.

There are two sentences in the preface to the Pavilion of Prince Teng: "Wu Huatianbao, the Dragon lights shoot the ruins of Niu Dou"; the outstanding people, Xu Ru falls on the couch of Chen Fan.

That's what he said. It's very famous.

Then, wait, you said, "why don't you sweep the house in one house?" how did it not happen? So, the story of Da bear's teacher is still a bit of a story. Later, many people gave Xue Qin a sentence: "why don't you sweep a house without sweeping it?"

Then the story became the bridge of the prodigal son, and from then on, Chen became strong and finally ranked three.

Unfortunately, this is not the case.

The fact is that in the Qing Dynasty there was a literary writer named Liu Rong who did the same thing. Then his father criticized him and said, "why does a house not govern? Why do we live in the world?"

Later, the story goes back to the way it should be. From then on, Liu Rong summed up a conclusion that "the gentleman's learning is expensive and prudent."

It means that if you want to succeed, you must be steadfast and step by step.

Perhaps later generations felt that a writer's weight was not enough, otherwise the three gentlemen were rather foreign, so he composed the two stories and spread them down.

The story itself is nothing to say, everyone knows, what we want to discuss here is actually the collision of views.

The question is why the first person did not clean the room and became prime minister.

Second people listened to it, changed it, studied it well, and ended up being a poor literati. This is not in line with the mainstream values! This is where we should ponder.

If it is a debate, then the topic is, if a house is not swept, can it sweep the world?

To say that we can sweep, it is probably a matter of great importance.

If we can't sweep it, we should say that a thousand miles start with a single step.

Who is right or who is wrong? I think both are wrong. The question is, who are you?

Our previous

Judgment is often two yuan, that is, how to do it right and how to do it wrong.

Then, if you don't clean your room, you must choose a right or wrong one. It must be wrong. If it is right, no one will clean the room.

But in fact, Huaibei is the world of orange, and the world should be diverse. At least one word is called "different from person to person".

That is to say, for some people, it is right to not sweep the room. For example, Newton did not cook his pocket watch as an egg. You must criticize him for not cooking the eggs.

For some people, they are useless.

It's better to think about life in the house all day than to clean it.

So, we begin to feel restless again, for people with weak abilities, if they are in a kind of

He would be very upset because he didn't know what to do.

For a person with strong ability, if he is in a certainty, he will feel very uneasy because he can see his future at a glance.

What kind of person are you?

So the last question is back to the old topic of knowing ourselves and recognizing ourselves at the same time.

In other words, you need to know who you are and admit it.

The meaning of recognition is that you should not be too ambitious to know how many pounds you weigh, especially if you are holding the slogan of "long live the ideal".

I have always advised you to do things in a safe way. The principle is that basically, you are an ordinary person, you can not make the prime minister, so you still have to do your job well.

Then you ask me, is it possible that this person can be prime minister, and you can't do what you say? No, really, how can it be influenced by me? Many people are happy now. Well, I can not listen to the big bear in the future. Maybe I can become prime minister?