The Textile Chamber Of Commerce Leads The EU To Participate In The EU Polyester Staple Anti Subsidy Hearing.

< p > recently, Xiao Ling deputy "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com//business/ "> secretary general" /a "with the staff of the Ministry of Commerce, Wang Tao, lawyer of the UBS law firm, and Mr.Kenneth Davis, the EU attorney general, participated in the hearing at the European Commission's trade general division.

Wang Zhenfu, the first Secretary of our mission to the European Union, took part in the mission.

The European Commission's Susanne Kellner, the official in charge of the case, and the Arthur Braam, who were in charge of dumping and damage affairs, attended the meeting.

Xiao Ling, deputy secretary general, made the first speech. He pointed out that China's PSF enterprises had gone through the anti-dumping tax imposed by the European Commission for 10 years. In June 2011, the European Union just completed anti-dumping investigations against China's PSF products and entered the normal trade order. However, it took less than 2 years. European Union related industries actively prepared and filed countervailing investigations. Since there has been no damage, why do they propose new restrictions on the grounds of damage? The textile chamber of Commerce believes that the complainant's intention is to get rid of competitors and monopolize the market through the trade relief procedures licensed by WTO.

< /p >

< p > December 19, 2013, the European Commission launched countervailing investigations on polyester staple fiber (PSF) from China, India and Vietnam. This is another trade protection initiative launched by the European artificial fiber Association after the EU's abolition of PSF anti-dumping duties in June 2011.

In December 24, 2013, the textile chamber of Commerce convened the case coordination committee in the Ministry of Commerce.

< /p >

< p > March 2014, the European Commission investigation officials conducted on-site verification on 5 sampling enterprises, and in June, the Ministry of Commerce conducted a field verification of the government.

< /p >

In view of this, in order to express the opinions of Chinese enterprises and maintain the legitimate rights and interests of the respondent enterprises for the purpose of < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com//business/" > < /a > >, the textile chamber of commerce applied for a hearing to the European Commission in May and got the approval of the European Commission, < /p > p

< p > in addition, after a comprehensive analysis of the data of industrial damage in the European Union, the textile chamber of Commerce held that most of the data were positive, and the EU industry did not cause substantial damage. Moreover, in the 201020112012 three years, a lot of data indicators were fluctuating, not falling.

The fluctuation of these data indicators is the result of normal competition in the market.

Even if faced with some difficulties, they need to adjust through market strategy and sales policy instead of taking the trade relief policy licensed by WTO as the name to realize the reality of trade protectionism.

< /p >

< p > PSF is a raw material product. The products exported from China to the EU are of great significance to the wider downstream industries of the EU. The textile chamber of Commerce sees that some downstream associations of the EU have come out against the investigation of PSF, which fully demonstrates that more industries are opposed to restrictions from the interests of the European community.

< /p >

After "P", Mr. Ken, the acting attorney of the textile chamber of Commerce, made a speech on the above three aspects of the chamber of Commerce, analyzed the specific legal facts and data, and further expounded the damage of related industries in the European Union. From the data provided in various aspects, the EU industry has not been damaged, and the so-called damage is not caused by Chinese enterprises, especially the government subsidies.

In the calculation process of subsidies, the Commission has unreasonable ways of setting up subsidies instead of artificially increasing the subsidy rate of Chinese enterprises.

< /p >

< p > finally, Deputy Secretary General Xiao Li said that the textile chamber of Commerce and the stakeholders involved in PSF products also pursue fair trade. I hope that the European Commission will carefully consider and comprehensively weigh the results and give the Chinese respondent enterprises good results through fair decisions.

< /p >