Media Talk About The Impact Of Wage Increases On Footwear Imports

Christmas is coming soon in the western traditional festivals.

Seeing this report from the western media, it is felt that American hegemonic thinking is not only reflected in the military field, but also in the economic field, and Americans still have a habit of discrimination against China.

The Americans can send their soldiers to the battlefields of every corner of the world, tell the local people that they can not bully our American soldiers, who will bully them; where the Americans go to do business, the US dollar will become a hegemon.

China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001 and began to go deeper into the world economy.

No matter from the macro economic comparison between China and the United States, or from the reality that China has become the largest creditor country in the United States, the integration of the world economy has become a consensus. China is closely related to the US economy and has an impact on each other.

The United States lists a series of data: "80% of the imported shoes come from China, and this year, the import price of footwear products has increased by 6.1%; 60% of the imported furniture comes from China, and the price of furniture has also increased by 6.1%; 80% of the leather suitcases are also from China, and the price increase has reached 8.3%".

The US media concluded that the rise of Chinese workers' wages was one of the main reasons for the rise in US consumer prices, which was both farfetched and absurd.

The main cause of economic development must come from internal factors.

The rise in consumer prices is a phenomenon that any country can face, and it is also an unavoidable problem in the development of any economy.

Why did the United States not bear the main responsibility for the loss of world economy when it caused a vicious impact on the world economy, and now blamed the rising wages of Chinese workers on the rise in US consumer prices?

In the eyes of some Americans, China and other developing countries have not been put on equal status. Once the development of the world economy is good, they will publicize the contributions made by the United States. Once problems arise, they will shirk their responsibilities to developing countries such as China.

In the final analysis, this is a kind of discrimination thinking.

Who in the past few years has vigorously promoted the development of the world economy and made a great contribution to the prosperity of the world economy? I believe that the European Union countries are more objective and clearer, otherwise they will not reach out to China first when they encounter the debt crisis.

From this point of view, the European Union countries are much more conscious and rational than the United States.